Most business owners don't think about HR until something forces them to. A staff member raises a grievance, an employment contract turns out to be years out of date, or someone quietly resigns and you realise you've got no idea what your obligations are around their final pay. By the time HR lands on your desk, it's usually not at a convenient moment.
That's a big part of why so many small and medium businesses end up calling a human resources consultant for the first time mid-crisis, rather than before one. It doesn't have to go that way. Knowing roughly what a consultant does, and at what point it's actually worth the spend, tends to save owners a fair bit of stress. Usually money too.
In the early days, HR is usually handled by whoever's around. The founder writes the contracts, sorts out pay, smooths over the odd personality clash. For a team of three or four, that's honestly fine most of the time.
It starts to break down once headcount grows. There's more award interpretation to get right, more onboarding to keep on top of, more performance conversations that need handling properly instead of being put off for a month. Employment law in Australia isn't scaled to business size - the Fair Work Act, the National Employment Standards and modern awards apply just as much to a five-person team as a five-hundred-person one. Googling award rates at 9pm because you can't sleep is not really a strategy, it's a symptom.
This is usually the point where an HR consultant starts to make commercial sense - not because the business has done anything wrong, but because the informal approach has simply run out of road.
It's a broader job than most people expect going in. Contracts and position descriptions get reviewed and rewritten. Award classification and pay rates get checked, often more than once as a business restructures. Performance issues get managed before they turn into disputes. Somebody impartial handles the workplace investigations nobody inside the business really wants to run. And there's usually a hand in recruitment and onboarding too, especially once a business is growing fast enough that hiring has become its own headache.
What ties it together is judgement, not paperwork. Templates are useful, sure, but they're maybe half the job. The rest is knowing how to apply them to an actual employee who's frustrated, or underperforming, or halfway out the door already, and landing on an outcome that works without creating a legal mess afterwards.
Cost is usually the first objection, and it's a fair one. Bringing on a full-time HR manager in Australia typically runs well over $100,000 once you factor in superannuation and on-costs, which is a hard number to justify for a business that doesn't need HR support every single day.
The second reason has less to do with money and more with a bad past experience. Plenty of owners have worked with an advisor at some point who seemed mostly focused on covering the business legally, throwing in caveats instead of answers, framing everything around risk instead of what to actually do about it. That kind of experience makes people wary of going back for a second opinion, even once they know they should.
Outsourced HR consulting sits somewhere between those two worries. You get access to someone with real experience when you need them, you're not carrying a full-time salary on the books, and it doesn't feel like you've hired a law firm just to run your business.
Qualifications matter, but honestly they're just the baseline. The stuff worth paying attention to is a bit less obvious than a certificate on a website.
Industry knowledge is one. If you're running a hospitality business and the consultant's last three clients were all in finance, the advice is going to be generic - award interpretation and the kinds of issues that come up look pretty different depending on the sector.
Then there's whether you actually get a straight answer out of them. Some advisors hedge everything in qualifications and disclaimers until you're not sure what they've actually recommended. A decent one will explain the risk plainly and still tell you what they'd do in your position.
It's also worth asking what's happened with clients similar to you, rather than reading through a services page. Writing “workplace investigations” as a bullet point is easy. Being able to talk you through how one actually unfolded, and what came of it, is a different thing entirely.
There's no single number here, because it depends heavily on what you need. A one-off project - say, an audit of your contracts and policies, or support through a single redundancy - is usually priced as a fixed fee. Ongoing support tends to be structured as a retainer, giving you access to advice as issues come up without paying for a full HR department you don't have the workload to justify.
The comparison worth making isn't “consultant versus doing nothing.” It's “consultant versus the cost of getting it wrong.” A single unfair dismissal claim, an underpayment issue that's been running for two years before anyone notices, or a workplace investigation handled badly enough to end up in front of the Fair Work Commission will usually cost a business far more than years of consulting fees combined.
A few situations tend to come up again and again with businesses that finally decide to bring someone in: they're about to hire their first employee and have no idea where to start with contracts; they've had a performance issue drag on for months because nobody wanted to deal with it properly; a recent hire has raised a concern that needs to be looked into by someone outside the business; or they've simply grown past the point where the owner can keep HR in their head alongside everything else they're running.
None of these situations need to turn into a crisis before it's worth picking up the phone. Providers like Melbourne-based HR Gurus work specifically with small and medium businesses that don't have - and often don't need - a full-time HR department, which is usually the more practical starting point than trying to build one from scratch.
Getting HR right isn't about eliminating risk altogether - that's not realistic for any business that employs people. It's about having someone in your corner who understands both the legal side and the commercial reality of running a business, so the decisions you make about your people hold up when they're tested.
| No comments yet. Be the first. |
